Open Trade Bangladesh
Home / Export room / Part F
Lesson 18 of 42 · Part F · Level 2 · Explained

Digital trade corridors: the pilot and its principles

Bangladesh Bank has set up a pilot for digital trade documents under collections and LCs, through approved trade corridors. Why a pilot, which deals it covers, the five principles every participant follows, and how a bank asks to join.

In Lesson 17, Endorsing, sending and keeping e-documents, Evelyn watched Habib endorse a bill of lading without a pen, send the set to Hamburg through a secure channel, and keep an audit trail that could answer any question in one click. Paperless collections were working nicely.

Then Habib came to the factory in Gazipur with fresh news. "Bangladesh Bank has issued FEPD-1 Circular No. 26, dated 30 July 2026. It sets up a pilot for digital trade documents through approved trade corridors. And this time LCs are in it too, not only collections."

Evelyn put down her tea. "A corridor? Like the one between my office and the cutting floor?"

"A little bigger," said Habib. "There is a country at each end." To explain the thinking behind it, he had invited Dr Omar: an economist with a doctorate, a university professor, and a retired government officer who once served as Chairman of the Bangladesh Investment Board.

Dr Omar laughed at Evelyn's question. "Not so different, actually. A corridor is a known path between two rooms. Here the rooms are two countries, and the path is agreed in advance so that documents can walk it safely. Let's see why Bangladesh Bank wants to build one, and what rules every traveller must follow."

This lesson starts Part F of the export room.

Para F-1New to the master circular

Pilot framework for digital processing

In plain words

F-1 introduces a pilot framework for the digital processing of trade documents. Let's unpack it piece by piece.

  • What it covers: both export and import transactions under documentary collections and letters of credit (LCs).
  • How: through approved trade corridors. A corridor is a route between two countries or regions that has been approved for the pilot. F-4 explains how a corridor is proposed and approved.
  • Why: to take digitalisation in cross-border trade further, and to make trade finance work with more efficiency (faster, less waste), transparency (easier to see what happened) and resilience (able to keep going when something goes wrong).

F-1 also says what kind of electronic documents the framework wants to support. They should be:

  • interoperable, meaning they work across different systems;
  • secure; and
  • legally reliable.

These include Electronic Transferable Records (ETRs), the electronic versions of documents such as bills of lading and bills of exchange. And all of it should stay in line with evolving international standards.

Note the word pilot: a trial on a controlled scale before wider use. Dr Omar compares it to a new bus route. "You run a few buses on one road first, find the potholes, and only then add more routes."

One small point: F-1 speaks of both export and import transactions, while the scope list in F-2 names export transactions. This lesson follows the export side.

At the desk

Evelyn asks Habib whether the new pilot is only about collections, like Part E. Habib explains that F-1 introduces a pilot framework for digital trade documents under both documentary collections and LCs, through approved trade corridors. Its aim is more efficient, transparent and resilient trade finance, using secure and legally reliable e-documents, including ETRs.

Key words
Pilot basis
Trying a new way of working first on a small scale, before using it widely.
Trade corridor
An approved route between two countries or regions (a country/region pair) through which banks pilot the digital processing of trade documents.
Electronic Transferable Record (ETR)
An electronic version of a document that can be transferred, such as a bill of lading or a bill of exchange, carrying the same rights as the paper one.
Letter of credit (LC)
A bank's promise to pay the seller, as long as the seller presents the right documents on time.
Read the rule as written (Para F-1)

A pilot framework for digital processing of trade documents covering both export and import transactions under documentary collections and letters of credit (LCs) through approved trade corridors is introduced with a view to further advancing digitalization in cross-border trade and enhancing efficiency, transparency, and resilience in trade finance operations. This framework aims to support interoperable, secure, and legally reliable electronic trade documentation, including Electronic Transferable Records (ETRs), in line with evolving international standards.

Source: Bangladesh Bank, FEPD-1 Circular No. 26, 30 July 2026, Part F, paragraph 1 (page 27). The original circular is the authority.

Para F-2New to the master circular

Scope and coverage

In plain words

F-2 sets the scope: which deals these instructions apply to. There are three groups.

(a) Export collections. Export transactions under documentary collections, on either DP (Documents against Payment) or DA (Documents against Acceptance) terms, governed by the latest URC and the eURC Supplement.

(b) Export LCs. Export transactions under documentary credits, governed by the UCP in force and, where applicable, the electronic presentation rules known as eUCP.

(c) Related trade financing. Trade financing activities that involve electronic trade documents and sit within approved pilot arrangements.

So the export deals in (a) and (b) stand on a familiar rule book. Collections stand on URC, with its electronic add-on, eURC. LCs stand on UCP, with its electronic add-on, eUCP, where it applies.

Dr Omar puts it in cricket terms: "It's the same game. The match has simply moved to a new ground, so there's a small extra page of ground rules."

Notice the two conditions in (c): the financing must involve electronic trade documents, and it must be within approved pilot arrangements. The circular doesn't list which kinds of trade financing count under (c).

At the desk

Evelyn's next order from Hamburg will be paid under an export LC instead of a collection. She asks Habib whether the pilot can cover it. Habib checks F-2(b): export transactions under documentary credits, governed by the UCP in force and eUCP where applicable, are in scope, as long as the deal goes through the approved pilot arrangement.

Key words
URC
Uniform Rules for Collections (URC 522). Rules for sending documents through banks for payment without an LC.
eURC
The Supplement to the Uniform Rules for Collections (URC 522) for electronic presentation: the add-on that covers presenting collection documents electronically.
UCP
Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. The ICC rule book for LCs (current version: UCP 600).
eUCP
The electronic add-on to the UCP: the rules that cover presenting documents under an LC in electronic form.
Read the rule as written (Para F-2)

The instructions shall apply to:

(a) Export transactions under documentary collections (DP/DA) governed by latest URC and eURC Supplement;

(b) Export transactions under documentary credits governed by UCP in force and applicable electronic presentation rules (eUCP, where applicable); and

(c) Related trade financing activities involving electronic trade documents within approved pilot arrangements.

Source: Bangladesh Bank, FEPD-1 Circular No. 26, 30 July 2026, Part F, paragraph 2 (page 27). The original circular is the authority.

Para F-3New to the master circular

Core principles for digital trade documents

In plain words

F-3 sets five core principles. All participants under the framework must follow them.

(a) Interoperability. Electronic trade documents must be capable of being issued, transmitted, received and verified across different systems, without depending on any single platform. Think of sending money from your mobile wallet to a friend's account at another bank. Nobody wants a document that opens only on one company's software.

(b) Technology neutrality. No specific technology, platform or vendor is made compulsory, provided minimum security and functional standards are met. The bar is set; each bank chooses how to clear it.

(c) Decentralised verification. Anyone relying on a document must be able to check that it is authentic (genuine) and where it came from (its provenance), independently of the system that issued or sent it. This is done with cryptographic or equivalent mechanisms. It is like checking the watermark on a banknote yourself, instead of phoning the people who printed it.

(d) Data privacy by design. Sensitive trade data stays under the control of the document owner. Nobody may be required to store it in centralised or shared systems. Privacy is built in from the start, not added later.

(e) Legal functional equivalence. Electronic trade documents, including ETRs, are treated as functionally equivalent to paper documents, meaning they do the same job, where they meet the applicable legal and operational requirements. The condition matters: an e-document earns paper's standing by meeting those requirements, not simply by existing.

Dr Omar sums it up in one breath: "Works everywhere, favours no vendor, anyone can check it, the owner keeps the data, and a good e-document counts like paper."

At the desk

A software vendor visits Habib's bank and says its platform is "the only one allowed" for the pilot. Habib smiles and explains that under F-3(b) no specific technology, platform or vendor is mandated, as long as minimum security and functional standards are met. He adds that under F-3(a) the documents must work across different systems without depending on any single platform.

Key words
Interoperability
The ability of different systems to work together and exchange documents and data.
Technology neutrality
No particular technology, platform or vendor is made compulsory, as long as minimum security and functional standards are met.
Decentralised verification
Checking that an electronic document is genuine and where it came from, without relying on the system that issued or sent it.
Functional equivalence
An electronic document is treated as doing the same job as the paper one, when it meets the legal and operational requirements.
Read the rule as written (Para F-3)

All participants under this framework shall adhere to the following principles:

(a) Interoperability: Electronic trade documents shall be capable of being issued, transmitted, received, and verified across different systems without dependency on any single platform.

(b) Technology neutrality: No specific technology, platform, or vendor shall be mandated, provided minimum security and functional standards are met.

(c) Decentralized verification: Authenticity and provenance of electronic documents shall be verifiable independently of the issuing or transmitting system using cryptographic or equivalent mechanisms.

(d) Data privacy by design: Sensitive trade data shall remain under the control of the document owner and shall not be mandatorily stored in centralized or shared systems.

(e) Legal functional equivalence: Electronic trade documents, including ETRs, shall be treated as functionally equivalent to paper documents where they meet applicable legal and operational requirements.

Source: Bangladesh Bank, FEPD-1 Circular No. 26, 30 July 2026, Part F, paragraph 3 (page 27). The original circular is the authority.

Para F-4New to the master circular

Initiation of pilot trade corridors

In plain words

How does a bank join the pilot? F-4 sets out four points.

  1. Ask first. An AD must approach Bangladesh Bank for concurrence in principle, that is, agreement in principle, to take part in the pilot framework and use digital trade document processing.
  2. Say what you plan. The request must specify:
  • (a) the proposed trade corridor(s), given as a country/region pair;
  • (b) the counterparty banks and institutions;
  • (c) the type of transactions: LC, collection, or mixed;
  • (d) the technology approach and its interoperability features; and
  • (e) the risk management and compliance arrangements.
  1. Approval comes with conditions. Bangladesh Bank grants approval subject to readiness, safeguards, and compliance with this framework.
  2. Why corridors at all? Trade corridors are identified so that the pilot is controlled, legally aligned and operationally testable in cross-border settings.

That last point is the heart of the idea. Dr Omar explains: "When the route, the partners and the rules are all known in advance, a problem is easy to find and fix. Open the whole world at once, and you would never find the leak."

Notice how item (d) links back to F-3: the request has to show the interoperability that the principles call for. The circular doesn't give a form, a format or a time limit for the request, or for Bangladesh Bank's reply.

At the desk

Habib's head office wants to pilot a corridor between Bangladesh and Germany for exports like Evelyn's. Before starting, it approaches Bangladesh Bank for concurrence in principle. Its request names the corridor, the Hamburg bank as counterparty, the type of transactions (mixed: LCs and collections), its technology approach and interoperability features, and its risk management and compliance arrangements.

Key words
Concurrence in principle
Bangladesh Bank's agreement in principle for an AD to take part in the digital trade document pilot.
Trade corridor
An approved route between two countries or regions (a country/region pair) through which banks pilot the digital processing of trade documents.
AD (Authorised Dealer)
A bank branch licensed by Bangladesh Bank to deal in foreign exchange.
Read the rule as written (Para F-4)

(1) ADs shall approach Bangladesh Bank for concurrence in principle for participation in the pilot framework and use of digital trade document processing arrangements.

(2) Requests shall specify:

(a) Proposed trade corridor(s) (country/region pair);

(b) Counterparty banks and institutions;

(c) Type of transactions (LC/Collection/mixed);

(d) Technology approach and interoperability features; and

(e) Risk management and compliance arrangements.

(3) Approval shall be granted subject to readiness, safeguards, and compliance with this framework.

(4) Trade corridors shall be identified to enable controlled, legally aligned and operationally testable pilot implementation in cross-border environments.

Source: Bangladesh Bank, FEPD-1 Circular No. 26, 30 July 2026, Part F, paragraph 4 (page 27). The original circular is the authority.

Putting it together

So far: F-1 introduces a pilot framework for digital trade documents under collections and LCs, through approved trade corridors, to make trade finance more efficient, transparent and resilient. On the export side, F-2 covers export collections (latest URC and eURC), export LCs (UCP in force, eUCP where applicable) and related trade financing within approved pilot arrangements. Every participant follows five principles: interoperability, technology neutrality, decentralised verification, data privacy by design and legal functional equivalence. An AD joins only after approaching Bangladesh Bank for concurrence in principle with a detailed request, and approval depends on readiness, safeguards and compliance.

Next: Lesson 19, The legal base and e-documents in collections and LCs. What contracts must say, how ETRs are kept unique and safe, how e-documents are endorsed and transferred, and how exporters send them to their AD.

Check yourself

30 questions, in 3 sets of up to 10. Nobody sees your answers but you.

Set 1 of 3

1. What does F-1 introduce?
2. Which three qualities of trade finance operations does F-1 aim to enhance?
3. According to F-1, the framework aims to support electronic trade documentation that is:
4. True or false: F-1 says the framework covers transactions under both documentary collections and letters of credit.
5. Evelyn hears that the new framework mentions Electronic Transferable Records (ETRs). She asks Habib whether ETRs are part of it. What should Habib say?
6. Under F-2(a), which rules govern export transactions under documentary collections (DP/DA)?
7. Under F-2(b), which rules govern export transactions under documentary credits?
8. What does F-2(c) bring into scope?
9. True or false: under F-2(b), eUCP must apply to every export LC in the pilot, even where it is not applicable.
10. Evelyn's next Hamburg order will be paid under an export LC, not a collection. Can it come within the pilot's scope?

Set 2 of 3

11. Habib's bank handles a DA export collection under its approved pilot arrangement. A colleague says DA bills are outside the scope of F-2. Is he right?
12. Who must follow the core principles in F-3?
13. Under the interoperability principle, electronic trade documents must be capable of being issued, transmitted, received and verified:
14. What does technology neutrality mean under F-3(b)?
15. Under decentralised verification, how should the authenticity and provenance of e-documents be verifiable?
16. Under F-3(e), when are electronic trade documents, including ETRs, treated as functionally equivalent to paper documents?
17. True or false: under data privacy by design, sensitive trade data shall remain under the control of the document owner.
18. True or false: F-3(d) requires all sensitive trade data to be stored in one central shared system.
19. A platform offered to Habib's bank produces e-documents that can be sent and received only between banks that use that same platform. Which F-3 principle does this go against?
20. The Hamburg bank wants to check for itself that an e-invoice is genuine and really came from Evelyn, without relying on the system Habib's bank used to send it. Which principle says this check should still be possible?

Set 3 of 3

21. A service platform asks Evelyn to agree that all her sensitive trade data will be kept in its shared database, saying the pilot requires it. What does F-3(d) say?
22. Under F-4(1), whom must an AD approach to take part in the pilot framework?
23. How must the proposed trade corridor be described in the request?
24. Which types of transactions can a request name under F-4(2)(c)?
25. Subject to what does Bangladesh Bank grant approval under F-4(3)?
26. True or false: once an AD approaches Bangladesh Bank with a request, approval is automatic.
27. Habib's head office drafts its request to join the pilot. It lists the corridor, the counterparty banks and the type of transactions. What else must it specify under F-4(2)?
28. Evelyn asks Dr Omar why the pilot works through corridors instead of opening digital documents to every country at once. What does F-4(4) say corridors enable?
29. A bank plans to start digital trade document processing with a partner bank abroad next week, without telling anyone. What does F-4 require first?
30. Habib's bank's request to Bangladesh Bank names its partner bank in Hamburg. Under which item of the request does this belong?
Found this useful? Pass it on.

Brain feeling full? Take a tea break.